Skip to main content

Audit report

Audit report

To the readers of Ministry for Culture and Heritage’s financial statements, statement of service performance and schedules of non-departmental activities for the year ended 30 June 2011

The Auditor General is the auditor of Ministry for Culture and Heritage (the Ministry). The Auditor General has appointed me, JR Smaill, using the staff and resources of Audit New Zealand, to carry out the audit of the financial statements, the statement of service performance and the schedules of non-departmental activities of the Ministry on her behalf.

We have audited:

•  the financial statements of the Ministry on pages 20 to 42 that comprise the statement of financial position, statement of commitments, statement of contingent liabilities and contingent assets as at 30 June 2011, the statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in taxpayers’ funds, statement of departmental expenditure and capital expenditure against appropriations,statement of unappropriated expenditure against appropriations and statement of cash flows for the year ended on that date and the notes to the financial statements that include accounting policies and other explanatory information; and

•  the statement of service performance of the Ministry on pages 58 to 67; and

•  the schedules of non-departmental activities of the Ministry on pages 43 to 57 that comprise the schedule of assets, schedule of liabilities, schedule of commitments and schedule of contingent liabilities and contingent assets as at 30 June 2011, the schedule of expenses, schedule of expenditure and capital expenditure against appropriations, schedule of unappropriated expenditure and capital expenditure, schedule of revenue and receipts and statement of trust monies for the year ended on that date and the notes to the schedules that include accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Opinion

In our opinion:

•  the financial statements of the Ministry on pages 20 to 42:

– comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and fairly reflect the Ministry’s:

•  financial position as at 30 June 2011; and

•  financial performance and cash flows for the year ended on that date; and

•  expenses and capital expenditure incurred against each appropriation administered by the Ministry and each class of outputs included in each output expense appropriation for the year ended 30 June 2011; and

•  unappropriated expenses and capital expenditure for the year ended 30 June 2011;

•  the statement of service performance of the Ministry on pages 58 to 67:

– complies with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and

– fairly reflects for each class of outputs for the year ended 30 June 2011 the Ministry’s:

•  service performance compared with the forecasts in the statement of forecast service performance at the start of the financial year; and

•  actual revenue and output expenses compared with the forecasts in the statement of forecast service performance at the start of the financial year;

•  the schedules of non-departmental activities of the Ministry on pages 43 to 57 fairly reflect:

– the assets, liabilities, contingencies, commitments and trust monies as at 30 June 2011 managed by the Ministry on behalf of the Crown; and

– the revenues, expenses, expenditure and capital expenditure against appropriations and unappropriated expenditure and capital expenditure for the year ended on that date managed by the Ministry on behalf of
the Crown.

Our audit was completed on 29 September 2011. This is the date at which our opinion is expressed.

The basis of our opinion is explained below. In addition, we outline the responsibilities of the Chief Executive and our responsibilities, and we explain our independence.

Basis of opinion

We carried out our audit in accordance with the Auditor General’s Auditing Standards, which incorporate the International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and carry out our audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements, the statement of service performance and the schedules of non-departmental activities are free from material misstatement.

Material misstatements are differences or omissions of amounts and disclosures that would affect a reader’s overall understanding of the financial statements, the statement of service performance and the schedules of non-departmental activities. If we had found material misstatements that were not corrected, we would have referred to them in our opinion.

An audit involves carrying out procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, the statement of service performance and the schedules of non-departmental activities. The procedures selected depend on our judgement, including our assessment of risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, the statement of service performance and the schedules of non-departmental activities, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the Ministry’s preparation of the financial statements, statement of service performance and the schedules of non-departmental activities that fairly reflect the matters to which they relate. We consider internal control in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Ministry’s internal control.

An audit also involves evaluating:

•  the appropriateness of accounting policies used and whether they have been consistently applied;

•  the reasonableness of the significant accounting estimates and judgements made by the Chief Executive;

•  the adequacy of all disclosures in the financial statements, the statement of service performance and the schedules of non-departmental activities; and

•  the overall presentation of the financial statements, the statement of service performance and the schedules of non-departmental activities.

We did not examine every transaction, nor do we guarantee complete accuracy of the financial statements, the statement of service performance and the schedules of non-departmental activities. We have obtained all the information and explanations we have required and we believe we have obtained sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Responsibilities of the Chief Executive and the Auditor

The Chief Executive is responsible for preparing:

•  financial statements and a statement of service performance that:

– comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand;

– fairly reflect the Ministry’s financial position, financial performance, cash flows, expenses and capital expenditure incurred against each appropriation and its unappropriated expenses and capital expenditure; and

– fairly reflects its service performance; and

•  schedules of non-departmental activities, in accordance with the Treasury Instructions 2010, that fairly reflect those activities managed by the Ministry on behalf of the Crown.

The Chief Executive is also responsible for such internal control as is determined is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements, a statement of service performance and schedules of non-departmental activities that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

The Chief Executive’s responsibilities arise from the Public Finance Act 1989.

Responsibilities of the Auditor

We are responsible for expressing an independent opinion on the financial statements, the statement of service performance and the schedules of non-departmental activities and reporting that opinion to you based on our audit. Our responsibility arises from section 15 of the Public Audit Act 2001 and the Public Finance Act 1989.

Independence

When carrying out the audit, we followed the independence requirements of the Auditor General, which incorporate the independence requirements of the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants.

Other than the audit, we have no relationship with or interests in the Ministry.

Jo Smaill

Audit New Zealand

On behalf of the Auditor‑General, Wellington, New Zealand


Updated on 23rd July 2015